[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?
|
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:20:10 -0500 |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:58 PM, felix winkelmann<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM, John Cowan<address@hidden> wrote:
>>> [*] a lame name - any suggestions are welcome
>> How about "roaster" (a U.S. term for a large chicken suitable for
>> roasting, typically over 2 kg)?
> You're not serious...
If this were not a professional project, I would suggest "chicken-shit."
But I want to use this at work.
How about "chicken-feed"?
- [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Peter Bex, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Alex Shinn, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/02
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Kon Lovett, 2009/09/01