[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:30:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG scripsit:
> In the context, it's been bound. If ,%: returns the keyword instead
> of the value of the local variable, it's a bug.
It's not clear to me that binding keywords ought to be allowed at all.
What benefit does that provide? Normally, we rely on keywords being
self-evaluating.
--
Eric Raymond is the Margaret Mead John Cowan
of the Open Source movement. address@hidden
--Bruce Perens, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
some years ago
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 2011/10/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2011/10/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 2011/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2011/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, John Cowan, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 2011/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 2011/10/26
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 2011/10/24