Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-hackers (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Oct 31 2011 12:17:49 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• October 31, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer, Mario Domenech Goulart, 12:17
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] fix subtype check for fixed-size list/vector types in scrutinizer, Felix, 05:45
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer, Felix, 05:31
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] allow procedure in operator position of evaluated lists, Felix, 04:10
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Felix, 03:39
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Felix, 03:37
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Overhaul interrupt handling, Felix, 03:29
• October 28, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Mario Domenech Goulart, 22:23
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Mario Domenech Goulart, 21:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Felix, 09:06
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Mario Domenech Goulart, 07:25
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Felix, 07:03
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Mario Domenech Goulart, 06:24
• October 27, 2011
  • [Chicken-hackers] Language shoot-out: chicken vs. chicken-boot ends 1:2, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 15:39
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Overhaul interrupt handling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 09:55
  • [Chicken-hackers] Reminder (was: more news from the valgrind front), Jörg F . Wittenberger, 09:13
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Overhaul interrupt handling, Felix, 08:52
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Overhaul interrupt handling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 08:36
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Overhaul interrupt handling, Felix, 06:28
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Felix, 06:10
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] clustering, Felix, 05:18
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] also add debugging-output to generated C file, Felix, 04:41
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Christian Kellermann, 03:51
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw, Felix, 03:43
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] disable debug output in the scrutinizer, Christian Kellermann, 03:27
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] disable debug output in the scrutinizer, Felix, 03:18
• October 26, 2011
  • [Chicken-hackers] an interesting idea?, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 15:31
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 07:57
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] C_reclaim cleanups and debug output for m-stack resize, Christian Kellermann, 05:43
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] C_reclaim cleanups and debug output for m-stack resize, Felix, 05:37
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Christian Kellermann, 05:31
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use write-string port method in write-string, Felix, 05:13
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] C_reclaim cleanups and debug output for m-stack resize, Christian Kellermann, 05:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use write-string port method in write-string, Christian Kellermann, 04:43
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] remove obsolete heap-allocation functions, Christian Kellermann, 04:38
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 02:49
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 02:46
• October 25, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, John Cowan, 16:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 15:00
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, John Cowan, 10:30
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 10:07
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] C_reclaim cleanups and debug output for m-stack resize, Felix, 07:32
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use write-string port method in write-string, Felix, 07:10
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] remove obsolete heap-allocation functions, Felix, 06:58
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Felix, 03:59
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 03:53
• October 24, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 13:53
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 13:06
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 12:16
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Felix, 05:29
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 05:18
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 05:15
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Felix, 05:07
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Felix, 04:59
• October 23, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 16:15
• October 22, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 22:41
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] warn if binding to keyword, Felix, 19:38
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Felix, 16:36
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] disable debug-output for scrutiny, Felix, 11:16
• October 21, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 12:10
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 09:58
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 08:59
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle aliases generated by macro-expansion in "declare", Peter Bex, 08:48
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle aliases generated by macro-expansion in "declare", Felix, 07:39
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Felix, 07:33
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle aliases generated by macro-expansion in "declare", Felix, 07:27
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 06:35
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 06:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle aliases generated by macro-expansion in "declare", Peter Bex, 03:01
• October 20, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle aliases generated by macro-expansion in "declare", Felix, 21:35
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle aliases generated by macro-expansion in "declare", Felix, 21:00
  • [Chicken-hackers] Need help to understand C_mutate better., Jörg F . Wittenberger, 15:20
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] subtype-check for "the" forms, Christian Kellermann, 08:14
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] disable debug-output for scrutiny, Felix, 07:49
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] subtype-check for "the" forms, Felix, 07:39
• October 14, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Patch] Remove check_alignment macro, Felix, 07:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [patch] proposed bugfix for #712, Felix, 07:20
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] fix types.db entry for process-wait, Christian Kellermann, 04:09
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] fix types.db entry for process-wait, Felix, 03:54
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] interrupts overhaul, Felix, 02:56
• October 13, 2011
  • [Chicken-hackers] [Patch] Remove check_alignment macro, Christian Kellermann, 16:06
  • [Chicken-hackers] [patch] proposed bugfix for #712, Christian Kellermann, 16:02
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] interrupts overhaul, Alan Post, 14:15
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] interrupts overhaul, Jim Ursetto, 12:59
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] interrupts overhaul, John Cowan, 10:40
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] no EOVERFLOW on Windows?, Christian Kellermann, 09:33
  • [Chicken-hackers] interrupts overhaul, Felix, 07:37
• October 12, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run numbers-string-conversion-test in interpreted mode, Alan Post, 10:38
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run numbers-string-conversion-test in interpreted mode, Peter Bex, 10:20
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run numbers-string-conversion-test in interpreted mode, Alan Post, 09:23
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] no EOVERFLOW on Windows?, Alan Post, 09:21
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run numbers-string-conversion-test in interpreted mode, Peter Bex, 07:37
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] do the right thing when -force'ing "chicken", Christian Kellermann, 07:30
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: disable failing test on Windows, Peter Bex, 06:58
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: disable failing test on Windows, Felix, 06:45
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] disable failing test on Windows, Peter Bex, 06:10
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run numbers-string-conversion-test in interpreted mode, Felix, 05:02
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] do the right thing when -force'ing "chicken", Felix, 04:34
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] no EOVERFLOW on Windows?, Felix, 04:34
  • [Chicken-hackers] disable failing test on Windows, Felix, 04:31
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Use machine dependent size type for allocate_vector_2, Felix, 04:05
• October 11, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Use machine dependent size type for allocate_vector_2, Alan Post, 10:46
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Use machine dependent size type for allocate_vector_2, Christian Kellermann, 08:03
• October 10, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, John Cowan, 10:20
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Christian Kellermann, 03:16
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, John Cowan, 02:30
• October 09, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, John Cowan, 12:47
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Felix, 08:08
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Peter Bex, 07:49
• October 08, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, John Cowan, 20:36
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Christian Kellermann, 17:02
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Christian Kellermann, 16:55
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, John Cowan, 16:30
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Alan Post, 16:21
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Alan Post, 16:18
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Alan Post, 16:16
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Alan Post, 16:15
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, John Cowan, 16:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Christian Kellermann, 15:43
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Alan Post, 15:13
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Christian Kellermann, 15:09
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Alan Post, 14:58
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Christian Kellermann, 13:31
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Alan Post, 12:48
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Christian Kellermann, 09:39
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle EOVERFLOW and ENOTDIR gracefully in file/directory-exists?, Felix, 09:13
• October 07, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] unused unbound variable references could be optimized away, Christian Kellermann, 07:21
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] unused unbound variable references could be optimized away, Felix, 02:22
• October 05, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] mark let-bound variables as inline-transient (resubmission), Felix, 02:48
• October 04, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] mark let-bound variables as inline-transient (resubmission), Christian Kellermann, 16:01
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info, Christian Kellermann, 09:06
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info, Alan Post, 08:19
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] cleanup port checks (resubmission), Christian Kellermann, 03:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info, Christian Kellermann, 03:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] mark let-bound variables as inline-transient (resubmission), Felix, 02:13
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] mark let-bound variables as inline-transient (resubmission), Felix, 02:11
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] cleanup port checks (resubmission), Felix, 02:08
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info, Felix, 02:02
• October 03, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info, John Cowan, 11:23
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info, Alan Post, 11:19
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] PATCH: fix pthread on BSD, Timo Myyrä, 01:56
• October 02, 2011
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] PATCH: fix pthread on BSD, Peter Bex, 12:31
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info, Felix, 07:33
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Bugfix for #708, Felix, 07:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] PATCH: fix pthread on BSD, Christian Kellermann, 05:20
• October 01, 2011
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Bugfix for #708, Christian Kellermann, 16:45

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc