Re: [Chicken-hackers] Half a bug report

[Christian Kellermann]

* Jörg F. Wittenberger <address@hidden> [120605 14:59]:
> A chicken version from trunk as of 2012-02-10 did catch
> the following error with ease.  My next update per 2012-05-12
> did no longer.

So you have gotten a compiler error?

With master I get a runtime error only using the following code:

$ cat t.scm
(receive (a b c) (values 1 2 3 4) (print a b c))
$ csc t.scm
$ ./t

Error: bad argument count - received 4 but expected 3: #<procedure (f_28 a0 b1 
c2)>

       Call history:

       t.scm:1: ##sys#call-with-values
       t.scm:1: values                          <--


Same goes for the other way around:

$ cat t.scm
(receive (a b c d) (values 1 2 3) (print a b c d))
$ csc t.scm
$ ./t

Error: bad argument count - received 3 but expected 4: #<procedure (f_29 a0 b1 
c2 d3)>

       Call history:

       t.scm:1: ##sys#call-with-values
       t.scm:1: values                          <--

Adding -v or -specialize flags does not change behaviour here.

What did you see?

Kind regards,

Christian

--
9 out of 10 voices in my head say, that I am crazy,
one is humming.