[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Half a bug report
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Half a bug report |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:42:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
* Jörg F. Wittenberger <address@hidden> [120605 23:11]:
> That's been my point: as soon as I remove enough of the actual
> code to pin down the problem, everything is fine.
>
> To be clear my timeline step wise:
> 1. new (May) compiler on bad complex source compiled without
> warning into bad code. (Several compiler rebuilds
> and different machines.)
> [[Me so far no idea why.]]
> 2. Reverting to old (Feb) version gave immediately the warning
> about wrong parameter; not completing the compile.
> 3. Fixed the call both compilers produce good code.
> [[issue at hand solved now prepare the report]]
> 4. Try to boil the bad code into foo/bar -> hardly compiles
> until all "unrelated" stuff is removed. Eventually all
> appears to be more related than hoped for. Once short like
> that May compiler catch the error too.
>
> But don't aim chicken on the above example. It works.
> That is, it complains rightfully.
Then I can only give the same advice that doctors give when on their
wits' end: Please observe the further development of the patient's
health.
Thanks for the heads up! At the moment I don't now how to track this
further down on my end though...
Kind regards,
Christian
--
9 out of 10 voices in my head say, that I am crazy,
one is humming.