Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix bad call in chicken-install error situation

[Peter Bex]

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:13:10PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Attached is patch. It takes the least intrusive path: it fixes the
> number of arguments to `proc' by passing a thunk that will be called as
> `next' (it allows for procedures that receive it as argument doing
> whatever they want before actually calling `next').  That thunk just
> makes the process exit.

It doesn't seem to break anything and it *looks* good, so I've pushed it.
(again, I was unable to trigger this code path at all)

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth