chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]


From: Mario Domenech Goulart
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:12:35 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux)

On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:

> From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:46:37 -0400
>
>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:03:40 -0400 John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>> Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:
>>>
>>>>  # for cygwin
>>>> -test -f ../cygchicken-0.dll && cp ../cygchicken-0.dll .
>>>> +if test -f ../cygchicken-0.dll; then
>>>> +    cp ../cygchicken-0.dll .
>>>> +    cp ../cygchicken-0.dll reverser/tags/1.0
>>>> +fi
>>>> +mv ../cygchicken-0.dll ../cygchicken-0.dll_
>>>
>>> All these copies and moves, including the last, need to be inside the
>>> scope of the "if test -f", or it's not idempotent.
>> 
>> Indeed, John.  Thanks for noticing that.  Attached is an updated version
>> of the patch.
>> 
>> I tested it on master, and I could "make ... spotless install check"
>> successfully.
>
> Does that mean the deployment test succeeded?

Yes.

Mario
-- 
http://parenteses.org/mario



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]