Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] slightly more optimistic copy-propagation

[Peter Bex]

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:02:08PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> The second part of the patch turns out to be too optimistic. Strictly
> speaking it is correct, but it may be confusing. The code that caused
> the loop was this:

[snip]

Thanks for the explanation.  It makes sense, and I agree it's too
dangerous.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth