Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-hackers (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Wed Oct 31 2012 16:58:36 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• October 31, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Allow "unsetting" read syntax, Peter Bex, 16:58
• October 30, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Allow "unsetting" read syntax, Felix, 05:50
• October 29, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] process-fork: option to kill all but the current thread in the child process, Peter Bex, 16:45
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Allow "unsetting" read syntax, Peter Bex, 16:24
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] process-fork: option to kill all but the current thread in the child process, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 09:23
• October 28, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] advice needed on type-checking of vectors, John Cowan, 14:05
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] process-fork: option to kill all but the current thread in the child process, Felix, 11:10
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Allow "unsetting" read syntax, Felix, 09:32
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] process-fork: option to kill all but the current thread in the child process, Felix, 09:30
  • [Chicken-hackers] advice needed on type-checking of vectors, Felix, 09:26
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Allow "unsetting" read syntax, Felix, 09:14
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] process-fork: option to kill all but the current thread in the child process, Felix, 09:13
• October 27, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use chicken-syntax by default in compiled applications, Peter Bex, 11:44
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] catch "serious" signals SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, etc., Peter Bex, 11:11
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use chicken-syntax by default in compiled applications, Felix, 11:04
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] catch "serious" signals SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, etc., Felix, 10:26
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] enable scrutiny by default, Peter Bex, 08:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] enable scrutiny by default, Felix, 07:54
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] enable scrutiny by default, Felix, 07:33
• October 24, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] CR #931 and #932 have been accepted., Felix, 03:31
• October 16, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add .gitignore, Alan Post, 18:35
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add .gitignore, Felix, 16:54
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] add a second lightweight flow-analysis pass, Felix, 10:39
• October 15, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] install-extension fix for when the second arg contains pairs (SOURCE DEST), Mario Domenech Goulart, 19:34
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] install-extension fix for when the second arg contains pairs (SOURCE DEST), Mario Domenech Goulart, 19:07
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add .gitignore, Mario Domenech Goulart, 18:18
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Handle EINTR properly in process-wait, Christian Kellermann, 16:29
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] add a second lightweight flow-analysis pass, Peter Bex, 15:17
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Please vote for CR #931, #932, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 14:42
  • [Chicken-hackers] Please vote for CR #931, #932, Felix, 10:35
• October 13, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] small scrutinizer enhancement, Peter Bex, 03:52
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] respect -output-file option when compiling from stdin, Felix, 03:49
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] small scrutinizer enhancement, Felix, 03:48
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use inline safe block-accessors, Felix, 03:40
• October 12, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] respect -output-file option when compiling from stdin, Peter Bex, 15:29
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] small scrutinizer enhancement, Peter Bex, 15:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use inline safe block-accessors, Peter Bex, 14:43
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] add a second lightweight flow-analysis pass, Felix, 13:48
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] small scrutinizer enhancement, Felix, 13:24
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] respect -output-file option when compiling from stdin, Evan Hanson, 00:52
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] disallow compiling from both stdin & named files, Evan Hanson, 00:52
• October 09, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] perform immediateness checks inline before invoking mutation primitive, Peter Bex, 15:25
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] use inline safe block-accessors, Felix, 05:10
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] perform immediateness checks inline before invoking mutation primitive, Felix, 05:05
• October 08, 2012
  • [Chicken-hackers] CR: enable scrutiny by default, Felix, 14:27
  • [Chicken-hackers] CR: make non-standard syntactic bindings available by default, Felix, 14:22
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] types.db: stricter return types for read-line, Felix, 14:13
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] types.db: stricter return types for read-line, Mario Domenech Goulart, 10:39
• October 06, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Scrutiny type for signal-handler wrong, Mario Domenech Goulart, 19:47
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Scrutiny type for signal-handler wrong, Peter Bex, 12:30
• October 05, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Making -scrutinize the default?, Felix, 18:46
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Handle EINTR properly in process-wait, Peter Bex, 14:21
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] Making -scrutinize the default?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 12:39
  • [Chicken-hackers] Making -scrutinize the default?, Peter Bex, 12:28
• October 04, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Handle EINTR properly in process-wait, Felix, 17:47
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove deprecations, Felix, 17:46
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Clean up some code, Felix, 17:43
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Prevent running applications from crashing when reinstalling, Peter Bex, 15:25
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Prevent running applications from crashing when reinstalling, Felix, 15:16
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [RE-POST] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Disjoint return types with undefined (or *?) mess up "not" typechecks, Felix, 14:37
  • [Chicken-hackers] [RE-POST] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Disjoint return types with undefined (or *?) mess up "not" typechecks, Peter Bex, 14:09
• October 03, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Handle EINTR properly in getc(), John Cowan, 17:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Handle EINTR properly in process-wait (was: [PATCH] Handle EINTR properly in getc()), Peter Bex, 16:31
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Handle EINTR properly in getc(), Peter Bex, 15:12
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Prevent running applications from crashing when reinstalling, Christian Kellermann, 06:04
• October 02, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Prevent running applications from crashing when reinstalling, Mario Domenech Goulart, 16:35
• October 01, 2012
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] copy-propagation for variables bound to intrinsic, Peter Bex, 14:31
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] slightly more optimistic copy-propagation, Peter Bex, 14:10
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] copy-propagation for variables bound to intrinsic, Felix, 14:08
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] copy-propagation for variables bound to intrinsic, Felix, 14:06
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] slightly more optimistic copy-propagation, Felix, 14:05
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Prevent running applications from crashing when reinstalling, Christian Kellermann, 14:02
  • Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Prevent running applications from crashing when reinstalling, Felix, 13:57
  • [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Prevent running applications from crashing when reinstalling, Christian Kellermann, 11:42

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc