[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-hackers] Making -scrutinize the default?
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
[Chicken-hackers] Making -scrutinize the default? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:25:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
Hi all,
The scrutinizer has been tested a lot by now and I think it provides
useful warnings. Especially when it comes to deprecated stuff, it's
very useful to know when you're using stuff that will disappear in
the next release (case in point: the recent massive salmonella breakage
with master).
I believe it's been suggested before, but I still think it would be
a good idea to make -scrutinize the default. You'd get all of the
benefits of type checking, but none of the risky optimizations that
-specialize offers. I haven't seen bogus warnings from the scrutinizer
in quite a while.
Thoughts? Opinions?
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
- [Chicken-hackers] Making -scrutinize the default?,
Peter Bex <=