Re: [Chicken-hackers] strange error message, please help with interpretation

[Christian Kellermann]

* Jörg F. Wittenberger <address@hidden> [130309 12:26]:
> I'm afraid I have no idea how I could boil this down to a reproducible
> case.
> 
> I've seen it once so far in a logfile of a process, which xreates
> approximately 2000000 threads a day when communicating over WAN
> with about ten peers plus all those public web access (approx.
> since chicken does not have unique thread numbers, but rscheme
> does; when I run the rscheme version instead I see thos 2^6 threads;
> though the chicken version has a different runtime behavior and does
> not share 100% of the code, hence it could use a different amount of
> threads.)
> 

I am confused. I thought you were wondering about a compilation
message you get during the flow analysis of the scrutinizer. And
ripping out the offending definition with the corresponding code
paths from your (include)'d file was what I was asking for. I fail
to see how your runtime behaviour has any influence on that phenomenon.
Still I don't want to question your judgement as I don't know the
code. However I doubt that we are of much help without precise
descriptions of what's actually happening. Without code this is
highly improbable to be useful.

I am sorry,

Christian

-- 
In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than
water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can
surpass it. --- Lao Tzu