[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:22:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
> Note: in local procedure `doloop9',
> in toplevel procedure `foo#bar':
> (strcttps.scm:10) in procedure call to `null?', the predicate is
> called with an argument of type
> `null' and will always return true
That strikes me as Just Wrong. Even if a predicate is known to always
succeed, it shouldn't be impossible to call it, any more than it should
be impossible to call a predicate that always returns #t on any argument.
--
The Imperials are decadent, 300 pound John Cowan <address@hidden>
free-range chickens (except they have http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
teeth, arms instead of wings, and
dinosaurlike tails). --Elyse Grasso
- [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Peter Bex, 2013/03/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types, Peter Bex, 2013/03/25