[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:33:33 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:20:41 +0100 "Jörg F. Wittenberger" <address@hidden>
wrote:
> It's somehow related to code, which uses Petrofsky extraction
> (replacing some hon-hygienic macros I've been using before). This
> used to compile perfectly for several month. Now it returns some
> #<unspecified>
I'd bet it is a consequence of the introduction of `letrec*'. The
behavior of `letrec' has been fixed with the introduction of `letrec*'
(see
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2013-08/msg00017.html).
If you use `letrec' in your code, check if it is ok.
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2013/11/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Peter Bex, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, John Cowan, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Peter Bex, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Peter Bex, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too,
Mario Domenech Goulart <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Peter Bex, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Peter Bex, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Peter Bex, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Peter Bex, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/06