Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too

[Peter Bex]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:37:11PM +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
> >I'm afraid it's something within the macro expander itself... which 
> >means that it might effect more code than just the one here.
> 
> To that end: my code uses this syntax eventually in the context of a 
> lambda.  Maybe that's what's effected?

We can only guess at this point.  If you can show us some actual code
we might be able to do more.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net