[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimpl
|
From: |
Peter Bex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows |
|
Date: |
Sat, 2 Aug 2014 17:25:05 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 11:23:06AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
>
> > It's marked as unimplemented, only the implementation itself is removed.
> > The posixunix version is kept around because people may actually be
> > using it.
>
> In that case, the posixwin implementation should throw an "Unsupported
> on Windows" exception, as for fork() and other such things.
That's what the patch does. This mail and the previous suggest that
you haven't taken a look at it at the patch at all. That's very
annoying. Next time, please try to read the patch before asking
about things that are self-evident from a quick look at it.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows, Michele La Monaca, 2014/08/02
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows, Peter Bex, 2014/08/03
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows, Peter Bex, 2014/08/03
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows, Evan Hanson, 2014/08/12