[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR #1142 and upcoming changes
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR #1142 and upcoming changes |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:17:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> I'd love to hear from some of the people using CHICKEN in their business
> or for other Serious Projects (Kristian? Ivan? Andy?) how painful this
> would be for them.
I would be pretty damned inconvenienced if the numbers egg were broken for
any substantial period of time, though I have the utmost confidence in the
mission otherwise. Then again, I figure you'll continue to maintain it.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
"The exception proves the rule." Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves
my theory." Latin students think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts
the rule to the proof." But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an
exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR #1142 and upcoming changes, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/08/18