Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/5] List scrutiny special cases

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

Hi John,

On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:03:29 -0400 John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:

> Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
>
>> Wow, cool. I have to try these patches out. But note that hardcoding
>> special cases for SRFI-1 procedures is moot, since these will be
>> thrown of the core system, sooner or later (or in other words: there
>> will be only internally used variants, possibly with less error
>> checking).
>
> Eventually, there should be a way for eggs to add types to the
> scrutinizer database through a public API of some kind.

If I understand correctly your comment, that's already supported
(http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Types#using-type-information-in-extensions).

See the new eggs Felix created out of core code for examples
(binary-search, memory-mapped-files, object-evict and queues -- all in
svn).

Best wishes.
Mario
-- 
http://parenteses.org/mario