[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:59:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Oleg Kolosov <address@hidden> writes:
> We also struggled with posix and process control functions a lot (long
> story), trying to be functional here backfires badly, so we ended up
> with straightforward and ugly code (looking like verbose C with
> parentheses), replacing some functions from standard library (namely
> process-run) and customized error handling.
Is this something you find useful to have in general? Maybe we can
discuss your diffs if your contract permits that?
Congratulations to your success and product launch!
Christian
--
May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you be free from
suffering, and may you live with ease.
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/10/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Stephen Eilert, 2014/10/02
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Oleg Kolosov, 2014/10/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Peter Bex, 2014/10/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Oleg Kolosov, 2014/10/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, r, 2014/10/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Alex Shinn, 2014/10/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, r, 2014/10/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Alex Shinn, 2014/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Felix Winkelmann, 2014/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Alex Shinn, 2014/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Peter Bex, 2014/10/08