[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:19:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> Yes, the implementors. This adds additional complexity and creates
> more difficulty in testing, and it also makes it harder to use CHICKEN
> on various platforms when you want to use packages. Punting on the
> issue and leaving it to the user is a cheap cop-out. I'd rather stick
> with the current behaviour; at least it's a choice we can defend.
All right, to hell with it. We can't make everyone happy.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
Where the wombat has walked, it will inevitably walk again.
(even through brick walls!)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, John Cowan, 2014/10/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Florian Zumbiehl, 2014/10/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, John Cowan, 2014/10/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2014/10/14
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Michele La Monaca, 2014/10/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, John Cowan, 2014/10/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Peter Bex, 2014/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2014/10/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Oleg Kolosov, 2014/10/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2014/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN in production, Yaroslav Tsarko, 2014/10/08