[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Why isn't OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED the default?
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Why isn't OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED the default? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:05:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> Cool, that's useful info! What is -Ofast? Is it -O3, or something higher?
-Ofast has more optimizations than -O3. -Os has the same optimizations
as -O2 *except* those which typically increase code size, plus more
optimizations that reduce code size.
Nitty-gritty at <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html>.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
Please leave your values at the front desk.
--sign in Paris hotel
Check your assumptions. In fact, check your assumptions at the door.
--Cordelia Vorkosigan