chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Why isn't OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED the default?


From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Why isn't OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED the default?
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:05:21 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Peter Bex scripsit:

> Cool, that's useful info!  What is -Ofast?  Is it -O3, or something higher?

-Ofast has more optimizations than -O3.  -Os has the same optimizations
as -O2 *except* those which typically increase code size, plus more
optimizations that reduce code size.

Nitty-gritty at <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html>.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        address@hidden
Please leave your values at the front desk.
                --sign in Paris hotel
Check your assumptions.  In fact, check your assumptions at the door.
                --Cordelia Vorkosigan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]