Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] [5] Avoid storing threads in trace-buffer

[Jörg F . Wittenberger]

On Nov 4 2017, Christian Kellermann wrote:


Given that I presumed to compile with -no-trace and focus on ressource 
conservation: No. I feel, I have been warned. No, I do not see a point in 
runtime cost for debug features I could previously disable completely.

> * J?rg F. Wittenberger <address@hidden> [171104 20:07]:
> > Just wondering. If memory usage was the concern, why not simple compile
> > without tracing?
> >
> > This way we pay one more slot per thread. Plus some lookup. What do we 
> > earn?
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something?
>
> You will miss helpful error messages?