Re: [Chicken-hackers] CHICKEN 5 egg scheme-include install oddity

[Kon Lovett]

thank you for checking. i’ll look into it.

i use a lot of ‘ln -s’ to “mount" C4 vs C5. ex:

  ln -shf "${CHICKEN_PREFIX}/share/chicken" /usr/local/share/chicken
  ln -shf "${CHICKEN_PREFIX}/share/manual-labor-support" 
/usr/local/share/manual-labor-support
  ln -shf "${CHICKEN_PREFIX}/share/case-map-1.dat" 
/usr/local/share/case-map-1.dat
  ln -shf "${CHICKEN_PREFIX}/share/case-map-2.dat" 
/usr/local/share/case-map-2.dat

so reproducing could have some issues there. (hah, my /usr/local/share is a 
forest of symlinks, few of my design ;-)

> On Sep 23, 2018, at 2:35 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:40:11PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
>> Hi Kon,
>> 
>> I haven't been able to reproduce this with a small test case or by using
>> the includes branch of fx-utils in SVN. What does `echo ,r | csi` say
>> for this CHICKEN installation?
> 
> I've also tried and failed to reproduce it.  As far as I know, the "5"
> should never appear in the path anyway, we only use the binary version
> when constructing paths, right?
> 
> Could you please try to delete your chicken installation, the
> chicken-install cache and try from scratch?
> 
> Cheers,
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-hackers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers