[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1294 by mentioning in the docs that d
From: |
Evan Hanson |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1294 by mentioning in the docs that define-record-printer is not a definition |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:54:10 +1200 |
Hi Peter,
On 2019-09-14 15:28, Peter Bex wrote:
> I made a few small tweaks to the patch, see attachment. The types.db
> entry was syntactically invalid so I fixed that, and I've added checks
> that the argument to set-record-printer! is a symbol (the original
> macro contains that check as well). I've also added that check to
> record-printer, so that both procedures can now be #:enforcing in
> types.db.
That's better, thanks for catching that (and for having a look in the
first place). I've applied this version.
Cheers,
Evan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature