Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage

[Brian Jones]

Stuart Ballard <address@hidden> writes:

> Incidentally, the link for the jgss package is also misleading, as the
> RFC doesn't appear to contain any implementation of the package in
> question (I scanned all the way to the end, the only source code was
> examples of usage) and even if it did, the license on the RFC is not
> free (it does not allow modification of the RFC itself, although
> certain kinds of derived works are permitted).

Both of the links are apparently misleading.  Each points to standards
group or specification.  The RFC contains better javadoc than we'll
ever have concerning each interface, class, and method since you
indicate that text is non-free.  Chapter 6 should allow someone to
pretty easily create the 3 interfaces and 5 classes, some of which are
abstract.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>