Re: error building classpath with gcj 3.3.5

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 21:59 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:41:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 13:27 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > > Lets drop support for gcj < 3.4 now (3.3 is really ancient). And only
> > > > support gcj 4.0+ after the next snapshot (0.16) next month. GCC 4.0
> > > > isn't included in many distributions yet. Hopefully in 3 months when
> > > > 0.17 comes out this won't be a problem anymore.
> > > 
> > > Depending on GCJ 3.4 and up gains us nothing as 3.4 has the same inner 
> > > classes bugs
> > > as 3.3 has.
> > 
> > As does 4.0 probably.
> > What it gains us is less versions to test against.
> 
> 4.0 has some fixes in this area. 3.3 and 3.4 is the same in this area.
> Noone will do fixes for 3.4 and older anymore. When we force people to fix
> 4.0 this is good. With the workarounds in classpath noone will ever fix
> the bugs.

I am unsure what your suggestion is. My suggestion is that we drop
support (and workarounds, if any) for gcj 3.3 starting now. And drop
support for gcj < 4.0 after 0.16. Is that acceptable or do you think
that is not agressive enough?

Cheers,

Mark

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part