[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java
From: |
Jeroen Frijters |
Subject: |
RE: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:15:43 +0200 |
Archie Cobbs wrote:
> That description is ambiguous. It seems to me that "spurious wakeups"
> are an artifact of certain programming practices, not the VM itself.
I totally agree with Archie. Good programming practices != VM spec.
Upon reflection, it might be best not to provide a Java implementation
of holdsLock, since it will never be correct. I, however, am forced to
continue to use my broken implementation :-(
Regards,
Jeroen
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, (continued)
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Archie Cobbs, 2004/06/17
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/18
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Archie Cobbs, 2004/06/18
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/18
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Archie Cobbs, 2004/06/18
- Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Dalibor Topic, 2004/06/18
Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Steven Augart, 2004/06/18
Re: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Mark Wielaard, 2004/06/28
RE: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/06/17
RE: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java,
Jeroen Frijters <=
RE: Patch: Thread.holdLock implementation in java, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/06/18