[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GT
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ) |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:44:13 +0200 |
Chris B. Vetter writes:
> I noticed and that is exactly my point.
>
> *I* know how to get to the information I need. Users, new to GNUstep,
> and that's what we were talking about, may not.
> If you are new and genuinely interested in programming for GNUstep,
> a) you may not know where to get additional docs (Apple, OpenStep) from
> b) "Description forthcoming" is frustrating
>
> So, eventually you'll give up and turn to something else.
> "Use the source, Luke" isn't appealing to everyone.
All these sources of information are refered to on www.gnustep.org
(I'm pretty sure).
The point is that GNUstep is an implementation of some standard, the
documents of which are copyrighted by another entity than the FSF. So
we cannot distribute them along with any GNUstep distribution.
It's the same with any Single Unix System complient system:
programmers have to go to http://www.opengroup.org/ to read the
specifications. (Well, ok, there is some documentation of the local
implementation, but if you refer to it, you run the risk of writting
code dependent on the current system).
--
__Pascal_Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality.
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, (continued)
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Christopher Browne, 2003/06/12
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/12
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, William F. Adams, 2003/06/13
- Message not available
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, MJ Ray, 2003/06/14
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ),
Pascal Bourguignon <=
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Eric Christopherson, 2003/06/21
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep lesssuccessful than GTK and Qt?? ), Adam Fedor, 2003/06/21
- Most elegant solution to Reader/Writer Problem with Objective-C?, Lachlan Deck, 2003/06/18
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/06/16