[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:04:09 +0100 (BST) |
> This is going to lead to duplication in a single system.
> Installation1/System will have the same as
> Installation2/System. what about the contents of the Local
> domain? Its similar to having two linux systems on one machine.
>
> I view GNUstep more as a system. It is THE system. Others i
> think view it more as a location independent and mobile
> environment. There is a lot of functionality in GNUstep that is
> redundant in the second case.
Well we have to account for different points of view and "use cases".
If you think that having multiple GNUstep installations is not a good
idea, just ignore it and don't do it :-)
- GNUsteprc location (was: Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches), (continued)
Re: Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, jhclouse, 2004/08/12
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, John Davidorff Pell, 2004/08/17
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/08/18
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, John Davidorff Pell, 2004/08/18
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/08/18
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, John Davidorff Pell, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, John Davidorff Pell, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Armando Di Cianno, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Markus Hitter, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Nicola Pero, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Nicola Pero, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep.sh / env sanity patches, Nicola Pero, 2004/08/18