[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent)
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent) |
Date: |
29 Aug 2004 19:34:11 GMT |
Alex Perez <aperez@student.santarosa.edu> wrote:
> If anyone agrees that gdomap should be disabled by default (keeping in
> mind that functionality is not lost for intra-host DO, and only for
> inter-host DO) please voice your opinion on the matter here. [...]
It sounds reasonable to me. Those wanting inter-host DO could configure
it without too much trouble, couldn't they?
Would a gdomap-dbus be possible or pointless?
--
MJR/slef
Cue "]d" telling me how stupid I am again.
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), (continued)
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Rogelio Serrano, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Pete French, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Pete French, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Rogelio Serrano, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Rogelio Serrano, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
- Excellent technical overview of D-BUS, Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
Message not available