[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent)
From: |
Banlu Kemiyatorn |
Subject: |
Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (Was: D-BUS equivalent) |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 03:04:18 +0700 |
On 29 Aug 2004 19:34:11 GMT, MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> Alex Perez <aperez@student.santarosa.edu> wrote:
> > If anyone agrees that gdomap should be disabled by default (keeping in
> > mind that functionality is not lost for intra-host DO, and only for
> > inter-host DO) please voice your opinion on the matter here. [...]
>
> It sounds reasonable to me. Those wanting inter-host DO could configure
> it without too much trouble, couldn't they?
>
> Would a gdomap-dbus be possible or pointless?
>
> --
> MJR/slef
> Cue "]d" telling me how stupid I am again.
I didn't say that, you keep telling yourself like that in our
'private' discussion.
retards,
]d
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), (continued)
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Rogelio Serrano, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Rogelio Serrano, 2004/08/31
- Re: D-BUS versus GDOMAP (WINDOWS users please note), Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
- Excellent technical overview of D-BUS, Alex Perez, 2004/08/31
Message not available