dotgnu-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #68 - 16 msgs


From: Jeremy Petzold
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #68 - 16 msgs
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:11:10 -0700 (PDT)

We will have our own Authentication system that will
allow the customer to choose where to puth their data.
fo rsome one to use our system it will not be
nessisary for that person to use MS for anything. We
are a competitor to MS's .NET. We will have downward
compatability with .NET applications however, but that
only requires us to be able to run the software, not
use the .NET infrastructure.

-Jeremy
--- Zimran Ahmed <address@hidden> wrote:
> >Well, if you are already talking to people how look
> on Linux
> >favorably, then I'd say something like:
> >
> >     DotGNU is to .NET, as Linux is to Windows.  If
> you like
> >     Linux, then you will love DotGNU.
> >
> >Or something like that.
> 
> this would not be quite true though. Linux is a
> competitor to windows. 
> Depending on how DotGNU and .NET ends up being
> implemented, anything 
> using that architecture could still have to go
> through servers in Redmond 
> (as it is currently described, authentication from
> .NET *has* to come 
> from Microsoft).
> 
> So, DotGNU is something that help Windows spread its
> liscensing regime to 
> more places. Of course, all of this depends on how
> Microsoft ends up 
> decided to implement its authentication services,
> but given past 
> behavior, i know where the smart money should be.
> 
> zimran 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]