APR? (was Re: [DotGNU]Pnet and Compatibility libraries)

[S11001001]

Gopal.V wrote:
>         /Me thinks this is a good idea. But the question here is will
> Pnet's compat library be faster than Common C++. What about memory
> footprint of SEE + PNET ?.

Something from that O'Reilly article on Rotor that caught my eye was
the Apache Portable Runtime (http://apr.apache.org/). The homepage says
it provides compatibility for C. Could this be used [in combination with
cc++] instead of home-growing a new compat lib for pnet?

--
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
        -- Unknown source