|
From: | Stephen Compall |
Subject: | rant/flame on compiler Error Reporting (was Re: [DotGNU]Supporting MS Error code syntax) |
Date: | Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:10:44 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021028 |
Rhys Weatherley wrote:
Gopal V wrote:I had a mail from the Eclipse Csharp people saying "your error messages are not in ECMA format" ... Currently I think a hundred line patch to their compiler invoke code can fix them up for CSCC support ...Where, pray tell, in the ECMA standard does it specify the error message format? Or even the list of error codes that should be emitted for various conditions?
This reminds me of a reply from a Mono on changing their error reporting to match GNU standards instead of what csc does. They said "it would break compatibility with all the .NET tools out there." <ahem> *all* the .NET tools? (i.e. I guess the tools that use the GNU standard just can't compete)
+, if Eclipse wants to be any good, it had better be extensible in such areas. To match *proper* implementations.
-- Stephen Compall Also known as S11001001 DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org When I cook spaghetti, I do object if someone else eats it, because then I cannot eat it. His action hurts me exactly as much as it benefits him; only one of us can eat the spaghetti, so the question is, which? The smallest distinction between us is enough to tip the ethical balance. But whether you run or change a program I wrote affects you directly and me only indirectly. Whether you give a copy to your friend affects you and your friend much more than it affects me. I shouldn't have the power to tell you not to do these things. No one should. -- RMS, "Why Software Should Not Have Owners"
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |