Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU policies

[James Michael DuPont]

--- Gopal V <address@hidden> wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Peter Minten wrote:
> > > > Also it means making the bytecode interpreters accessible.
> > > 
> > > If it "also means" this, then it goes too far IMHO.
> > 
> > I agree. However, the pure rule does not say anything about the
> language
> > functions are written in, it just says functions have to be
> accessible using C.
> > If bytecode interpreters have to be hacked than that is clearly a
> sign that the
> > functions are NOT accessible using C. Let me rephrase:
> 
> All the pnet runtine engine functions are accessible without hacking
> the
> interpreter . We've already demonstrated it with the DGEE program
> which
> runs it inside Goldwater and lets you access it with Apache+XmlRpc
> ...
> 
> And my Scripting ilrun with Python also worked really well for me
> without
> modifying anything in libILEngine.a ..

The swigging of pnet is nothing more than doing something like that
with a bit more flexibility.

mike

=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com