|
From: | Matias Fonzo |
Subject: | Re: [Dragora-members] Qi 2.0rc13 |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:23:01 -0300 |
User-agent: | Roundcube Webmail/1.4.6 |
El 2020-07-21 09:29, Michael Siegel escribió:
Hello. Am 21.07.20 um 10:08 schrieb Matias Fonzo:I attach a new release candidate of Qi 2.0. It contains code clean up, an internal replacement for basename(1) and dirname(1)Is there any reason not to use basename(1) and dirname(1) as offered by the system? I mean, they're both defined in POSIX.
It helps to avoid having to check for its existence (as an external requirement) and can also carry out the task a little faster.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |