[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key
From: |
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 10:32:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On October 4, 2008 12:44:45 pm Colin Ryan wrote:
> Yes I agree with that, but since the OTHERHEX key is the first and only
> private key in the keyring of the userid running duplicity is it not odd
> that i have to specify it for duplicity? It would be much nicer from a
> scripting perspective to not have to have this additional piece of
> knowledge for the scripts to function.
I don't know; I would think that relying on the position (and only-key status)
of the GPG key would be more of a problem and great cause for confusion.
-A.
- [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists), 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key,
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/09