[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Duplicati
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Duplicati |
Date: |
Wed, 06 May 2009 15:21:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) |
Michael Terry wrote:
> 2009/5/6 Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden>:
>> Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
>
> I hate to bring up the issue of licenses again, but Duplicati is LGPL.
> I'm 99% sure you can't take GPL code (either 2 or 3) and make it
> LGPL.
>
> Even if he rewrote it in a different language, a quick perusal of the
> code indicates there is some very similar code. I don't know the
> legal issues involved, but the relicense seem shady to me.
Not sure about the rewrite part, but can it be an executable and be
LGPL? I thought L was for library and duplicati is not a library.
...Ken
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature