duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] GnuPG 2.1


From: edgar . soldin
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] GnuPG 2.1
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:55:42 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0

On 11.12.2014 11:38, Philip Jocks wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we're running duply on a bunch of FreeBSD machines and run into trouble after 
> upgrading GnuPG to 2.1. This is what "duply thismachine status" looks like:
> 
> Start duply v1.7.4, time is 2014-12-11 11:33:53.
> Using profile '/root/.duply/thismachine'.
> Using installed duplicity version 0.6.24, python 2.7.8, gpg 2.1.0 (Home: 
> ~/.gnupg), awk 'version 20121220 (FreeBSD)', bash '4.3.30(1)-release 
> (amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)'.
> Autoset found secret key of first GPG_KEY entry 'XXXXXXXX' for signing.
> Test - Encrypt to XXXXXXXX,YYYYYYYY & Sign with XXXXXXXX (FAILED)
> 
> Sorry. A fatal ERROR occured:
> 
> Encryption failed (Code 2).
> [GNUPG:] BEGIN_SIGNING H2
> [GNUPG:] PINENTRY_LAUNCHED 38244
> gpg: signing failed: Operation cancelled
> [GNUPG:] BEGIN_ENCRYPTION 2 9
> gpg: /usr/local/bin/duply: sign+encrypt failed: Operation cancelled
> 
> Hint:
>   This error means that gpg is probably misconfigured or not working 
>   correctly. The error message above should help to solve the problem.
>   However, if for some reason duply should misinterpret the situation you 
>   can define GPG_TEST='disabled' in the conf file to bypass the test.
>   Please do not forget to report the bug in order to resolve the problem
>   in future versions of duply.
> 
> Before that, it complained about "gpg: WARNING: forcing compression algorithm 
> BZIP2 (3) violates recipient preferences", when I commented out our 
> "GPG_OPTS='--compress-algo=bzip2 --bzip2-compress-level=9'" line in the conf 
> file, the above happened.
> 
> Did anyone test duply/duplicity with GnuPG 2.1 yet?
> 

you are not alone :)
 https://sourceforge.net/p/ftplicity/bugs/76/

he seems to have figured out the issue. please comment on the bug ticket how it 
works for you.

thanks.. ede/duply.net



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]