Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity error message/traceback

[Thomas Prost]

Am Mittwoch, den 19.09.2012, 00:55 -0400 schrieb Michael Terry:
> Oh, sorry.  I meant sigtar.gpg and I guess I really meant sigtar.gz.
> (difftar/sigtar was just me being stupid, gpg/gz was me forgetting
> that the files aren't encrypted until we put them in the remote
> backend).
> 
> I'd be interested to see if the following (corrected) line works fine
> for all your sigtar files:
> 
> for t in *.sigtar.gz; do tar xfz $t; done
> 
> -mt

... I am just a little curious: Does anybody remember why those files
have been called signatures ?
--
No harm meant!
Thomas