Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.7 slowness

[Philip Jocks]

Hej Aaron,

> Am 25.07.2016 um 12:46 schrieb Aaron <address@hidden>:
> 
> Hello Philip,
> 
> On 2016-07-25 10:56, Philip Jocks wrote:
>> Hej Aaron,
>>>> Given your follow-up email, it would be good to rule out SSH as a cause. 
>>>> Can you please backup to a local folder (e.g. file:///tmp/dup_test) with 
>>>> both and see if there is still the time difference?
> [...]
>>> The command I run is
>>> duplicity collection-status --archive-dir '/var/.duply-cache' --name 
>>> duply_zzz_local --encrypt-key XXXXXXXX --encrypt-key YYYYYYYY --sign-key 
>>> XXXXXXXX --verbosity '9' --gpg-options '--pinentry-mode=loopback 
>>> --compress-algo=bzip2 --bzip2-compress-level=9' --full-if-older-than 1W 
>>> --volsize 200 'file:///path/to/zzz_local'
>>> time’s output:
>>> 0.6: 0.41 real         0.28 user         0.03 sys
>>> 0.7: 71.01 real        37.57 user        23.71 sys
>>> It’s a single chain, full backup has 3 volumes, one incremental with 1 
>>> volume and one incremental with 317 volumes.
>> have you been able to look into this or maybe even reproduce it?
> 
> Apologies, I completely forgot about this -- I'm better with bugs or 
> Launchpad Answers.
> 
> Can you please try dropping off all of your additional options and see if the 
> difference persists? I.e., what about:
> duplicity collection-status 'file:///path/to/zzz_local'
> with both versions (or whatever the minimum is that you need to make it run 
> -- I don't use collection-status much)? If that doesn't have the difference, 
> can you please put your options back in one by one to see which looks like it 
> is causing the issue?

thanks for getting back to me. Haven’t thought about removing options, now it’s 
getting interesting, weirdly. Keeping all options except for „—name“ is very 
fast. Adding „—name duply_zzz_local“ already takes several seconds now. So I'd 
figure, that’s what is at fault?

Cheers,

Philip