emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#27794: closed (efi vs bios grub detection)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#27794: closed (efi vs bios grub detection)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:10:03 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:00:39 +0100
with message-id <861rc4b4ag.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#27794: efi vs bios grub detection
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27794,
regarding efi vs bios grub detection
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
27794: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27794
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: efi vs bios grub detection Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:22:23 -0600
It was recommended in the IRC room that I send this email.
I struggled all yesterday failing to get GRUB (and thus GuixSD) to install in ways that I was positive had worked before.
Turns out the installation USB had booted UEFI rather than BIOS, so it refused to install what I understood to be the default (BIOS GRUB), even though I had done and partitioned everything correctly, and there were no meaningful hints as to why.
It would be nice if there was a little note about this in the install guide, something along the lines of, `EFI/BIOS detection for GRUB depends on how the installation image was booted.' (or whatever it actually does, I'm not sure really).

Thank you.




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#27794: efi vs bios grub detection Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:00:39 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 14:01, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 21:13, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 at 16:22, buen ouanq <buenouanq@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> It was recommended in the IRC room that I send this email.  I
>>> struggled all yesterday failing to get GRUB (and thus GuixSD) to
>>> install in ways that I was positive had worked before.  Turns out the
>>> installation USB had booted UEFI rather than BIOS, so it refused to
>>> install what I understood to be the default (BIOS GRUB), even though I
>>> had done and partitioned everything correctly, and there were no
>>> meaningful hints as to why.  It would be nice if there was a little
>>> note about this in the install guide, something along the lines of,
>>> `EFI/BIOS detection for GRUB depends on how the installation image was
>>> booted.' (or whatever it actually does, I'm not sure really).
>>
>> This bug is very old and had been forgotten.  I do not think it is
>> relevant anymore.  If it is, could you provide moreinfo.  Otherwise, I
>> will close it after the usual 3 weeks delay.
>>
>> <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/27794>
>
> If no moreinfo, I will close this bug in the coming days.

Since no moreinfo after a long a delay, closing!


All the best,
simon


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]