|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#25719: closed ("guix package -i" exception should be a normal error message) |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:24:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:23:40 +0100 with message-id <20210324232340.5ff63914@scratchpost.org> and subject line Re: bug#25719: "guix package -i" exception should be a normal error message has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25719, regarding "guix package -i" exception should be a normal error message to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 25719: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25719 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: "guix package -i" exception should be a normal error message Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:41:06 +0100 When I have network problems sometimes I get a backtrace like this: ... substitute: 1727: 3 [%start-stack load-stack #<procedure a97d60 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4047:10 ()>] substitute: 1732: 2 [#<procedure a99b70 ()>] substitute: In unknown file: substitute: ?: 1 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/175nlv448nk5kagwwl3zyy2w4726qfz6-guix-0.12.0-4.d9da/bin/.guix-real"] substitute: In guix/ui.scm: substitute: 1228: 0 [run-guix-command substitute "--query"] substitute: substitute: guix/ui.scm:1228:8: In procedure run-guix-command: substitute: guix/ui.scm:1228:8: Throw to key `bad-response' with args `("Bad Response-Line: ~s" (""))'. It might make sense to (a) convert that into a normal runtime error message and (b) Fallback to substituteless building (maybe only for this thing).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#25719: "guix package -i" exception should be a normal error message Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:23:40 +0100 SurepgpTopySCqnpT.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |