[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M-g in dired
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: M-g in dired |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:03:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> But in dired-mode-map, where "C-x `" is undefined, lookup-key
> currently returns:
> (lookup-key dired-mode-map "\C-x") => nil
> (lookup-key dired-mode-map "\C-x`") => 1
> The return value `1' of the last expression seems wrong.
No, it is correct. `lookup-key' only looks at the keymap passed as argument
and doesn't (and shouldn't) try and guess which other keymaps might/will be
active together with this keymap.
> This docstring is not very clear. The documentation in the Emacs Lisp
> is better:
> If the string or vector KEY is not a valid key sequence according to
> the prefix keys specified in KEYMAP, it must be "too long" and have
> extra events at the end that do not fit into a single key sequence.
> Then the value is a number, the number of events at the front of KEY
> that compose a complete key.
> For the case of dired-mode-map where lookup-key returns 1 for "\C-x`",
> 1 is not a number of events at the front of "\C-x`" that compose
> a complete key, because "C-x" alone is not a valid key in dired-mode-map.
It doesn't say "valid key" it says "valid key sequence". "C-x" is a valid
key sequence in this context. It is not bound to anything, but it is
a valid sequence. C-x ` is not a valid sequence on the other hand, because
read-key-sequence would have immediately stopped after C-x.
Stefan
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/01
- Re: M-g in dired, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/01
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/02
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/03
- Re: M-g in dired,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/04
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/04
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/05
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/05
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/08
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/08
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/03