[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M-g in dired
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: M-g in dired |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Nov 2005 20:37:23 -0500 |
>From the docstring I understood that "valid key sequence" means
a valid and bound key sequence, due to the sentence:
The number is how many characters at the front of key it takes
to reach a non-prefix command.
I will change that to say "a non-prefix key".
But you know you really should look at the manual
in cases like this.
However, if this is not what the docstring meant, and leaving the logic
of the current return value is desirable, then maybe `lookup-key' needs
an additional argument defining another logic of its return value.
Why?
Otherwise, almost all code in `lookup-key' should be duplicated in
`shadow_lookup'.
Why?
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/01
- Re: M-g in dired, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/01
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/02
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/03
- Re: M-g in dired, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/03
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/04
- Re: M-g in dired,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/05
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/05
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/08
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/08
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/03