[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple debugging sessions
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple debugging sessions |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:15:07 +1300 |
> I've not said that it's not desirable, but that its not a trivial task
> and I think there are more immediate and important goals. Moving over
> to GDB/MI aligns us with GDB development and will make a much more
> reliable interface.
>
> Can preparing to support multiple debug sessions be a secondary design goal
> when you switch to GDB/MI?
This issue is becoming more than a technical one. I will, of course, try to
work alongside the wishes of others. Nothing much can be done until after the
release, so I suggest that we discuss it then, when hopefully a clearer
picture will emerge.
Nick
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, (continued)
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/12
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/12
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/12
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Kim F. Storm, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Kim F. Storm, 2005/11/11