[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files)
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files) |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:31:39 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard M Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I mean, this is a misnomer which gives the illusion that there is such
> a thing as "no conversion", even though in reality there always is some
> conversion going on.
> `no-conversion' used to really mean no conversion.
> Why has that changed?
Nothing is changed. When you insert a file in a multibyte
buffer with no-conversion, each eight-bit code is converted
to a special 2-byte form to represent eight-bit character.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: ^M in the info files, (continued)
- Re: ^M in the info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/19
- Re: ^M in the info files, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/21
- Re: ^M in the info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/21
- Re: ^M in the info files, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/21
- Re: ^M in the info files, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/09
- "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Kenichi Handa, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Richard M Stallman, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files),
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/14
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/14
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/20
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/07/15
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/20