[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "no-conversion" coding system
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: "no-conversion" coding system |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:39:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> Its other name "binary" is a lot more unequivocal.
> Only if you are a programmer who knows that binary files are usually
> read with no conversions. Otherwise, the name "binary" doesn't have
Since the `no-conversion' method depends on the underlying byte-encoding
used in a file, it is inherently something for programmers,
bit-twiddlers, ...
Stefan
- Re: ^M in the info files, (continued)
- Re: ^M in the info files, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/09
- "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Kenichi Handa, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Richard M Stallman, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Kenichi Handa, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/14
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/20
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/07/15
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/20