[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rmail-toggle-header problem
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: rmail-toggle-header problem |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:34:04 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:12:05 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> So should it not yank the headers at all? Should it always yank the
> "condensed" headers? Should it yank the headers as displayed (the
> current behaviour)? Should it exclude "X-RMAIL"? Etc...
>
> I have no opinion, I'm wondering what Rmail users want.
I vote for the current behavior. Wrt the "X-RMAIL" header (or any
other headers added by Rmail), I don't care either way, although the
pre-mbox Rmail does copy the X-Coding-System header added by Rmail.
- rmail-toggle-header problem, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/17
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Chetan Pandya, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Chetan Pandya, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/21