[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rmail-toggle-header problem
From: |
Chetan Pandya |
Subject: |
Re: rmail-toggle-header problem |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:18:06 -0800 (PST) |
> I'm not sure that yanking from the full headers makes a lot of sense,
> though. Eg it includes the X-RMAIL headers in the yank. Would you ever
> want to include the full headers (all the Received: etc) in a reply?
>
> I doubt it, but this combination ought to do what is natural in the
> circumstances, which is to yank the headers that are visible.
> To do otherwise would require artificially filtering them in a second place.
>
> if the user asks for it, we may as well do what he asked for.
Personally, I don't find it terribly important. Just as it is possible to trim
the message content to reply only a part of the mail, it would be possible to
remove the headers as well, if not required.
I am also in favor of continuity with existing behaviour, unless there is a
good reason not to.
Chetan
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, (continued)
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Chetan Pandya, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem,
Chetan Pandya <=
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/20
- Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/21
Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2009/02/20
Re: rmail-toggle-header problem, Xavier Maillard, 2009/02/22