[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Printing
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: Printing |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:45:01 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:03:18 +0900, Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> said:
> [...]
> ! if (FT_Load_Char (ft_face, i, FT_LOAD_DEFAULT) == 0)
> [...]
> ! font->underline_thickness = ft_face->underline_thickness * size /
> upEM;
> I've just comitted those changes. Thank you for finding
> them. Does the patch contain any other fixes?
Not in the patch, but I can find a similar code in xftfont.c for the
latter. And maybe
XFillRectangle (FRAME_X_DISPLAY (f), FRAME_X_WINDOW (f), gc,
x, y - font->ascent, width, y + font->descent);
in ftxfont_draw_backgrond (sic) should be
XFillRectangle (FRAME_X_DISPLAY (f), FRAME_X_WINDOW (f), gc,
x, y - FONT_BASE (font), width, FONT_HEIGHT (font));
What do you think about the use of GC extension data in the patch? It
allows us to extract information about clipping rectangles not from
struct glyph_string but from GC without using a wrapper.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: Printing, (continued)
Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/02
Re: Printing, Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/06
Re: Printing,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
Re: Printing, Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/06
Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/06
Re: Printing, Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/06
Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/06
Future of display engine [Re: Printing], Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/07
Re: Future of display engine [Re: Printing], YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/07
Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/07
Re: Printing, Kenichi Handa, 2009/04/07
Re: Printing, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/04/19
Re: Printing, tomas, 2009/04/02